![]() |
|
| West Midlands Liberal Democrats | <info@westmidslibdems.org.uk> | 6th July 2008 |
Children left at risk by fostering loophole - Brooke4.01.49pm GMT Tue 14th Nov 2006
Thousands of young children in private foster care arrangements could be left unprotected by new legislation intended to safeguard the most vulnerable because the Government has no record of who they are or where they are living The revelation comes from a parliamentary answer to Liberal Democrat Children's Spokesperson, Annette Brooke MP, in which the Government admitted it has records of only 730 cases when British Association for Adoption and Fostering estimates the figure is between 15,000-20,000. Research also shows that:
Commenting, Annette Brooke MP said "How on earth can we check that these people are suitable to look after a child if we don't know who they are or where they are? "This loophole needs to be closed immediately and a proper registration scheme set up. This is a gaping hole in government legislation that was supposed to protect these vulnerable children. "It is tricky because in many cases such arrangements are part of a certain cultural way of life, but nevertheless we have to work within communities to ensure the protection of all children. The Government should not be shying away from the issue simply because it is difficult. "There will be vast numbers of very suitable, safe and secure private foster care arrangements but we have to be concerned about the possibility that the new law will still leave some children in dangerous situations. "Victoria Climbie has to remain long in our minds and hearts. "The Government has been advised multiple times that a registration system is necessary to keep track of private foster care arrangements. Its deplorable that such action hasn't been taken. One must be put in place before we see any more tragic headlines."
Bookmark this story at:
Published and promoted by West Midlands Liberal Democrats, 53 Chawn Hill, Stourbridge, West Midlands, DY9 7JA. The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider. |